> This does break the naming recommendations given in X.521 Annex B > though, which don't allow for a stateOrProvinceName.
Yes, of course. The old Annex B, we obviously forgot about that one. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Oscar Jacobsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "David Lyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 6:23 PM Subject: Re: How best to build certificates for New business naming scheme > Just my two hundredths of a crown: > > (and I really hope I get the ordering right.) > > "O=McDonalds, L=Tampa, ST=FL, C=US" > > This does break the naming recommendations given in X.521 Annex B > though, which don't allow for a stateOrProvinceName. > > Best regards, > > file://oscar > > David Lyon wrote: > > We have a new business naming scheme that looks like this: > > > > "McDonalds@tampa(fl-us)" > > > > where McDonalds is the business name, tampa is the town, fl is the state > > code and us is the country. > > > > How is the best way to build certificates for this naming scheme ? > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
