In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 16 Apr 2002 11:29:00 -0400,
Harald Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
chk> X.500 uses the '/' convention, while RFC 2253 uses the ',' convention.
About X.500, that seems to be incorrect. I just looked through X.501
(which describes the directory models), and the few examples that
exist in chapter 9 (Names) and Annex H (Name Design Criteria) indicate
that the RDNs should be separated by ',' rather than prefixed with
'/'.
IIRC, the '/' convention is from X.400 addresses. Why it's used in
OpenSSL (as a renmant from SSLeay) is beyond me.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
