Ok, I'll buy it if thats what y'all think.
Do you have an explanation for this? Does the generated rpm not provide
those? Am i looking to the wrong package to provide me libssl.so.2 and
libcrypto.so.2? I have several rpms from redhat that say they require
these and openssl is the only ssl I'm willing to run (because its
awesome).
Basically, I'm fairly new to the redhat world. I have experience with
other Linux distros and generally use the *BSDs for my personal boxen
(which don't give me these wierd problems)... so please forgive my newbie
attitude here.
Thanks so much for the help and the excellent software,
Jim
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\x83\xec\x0c\x31\xc0\x31\xd2\x68\x2f\x73\x68\x21\x68\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x89\xe3
\x88\x43\x07\x50\x50\x53\x53\xb0\x3b\xcd\x80\x89\xf6 Don't forget FreeBSD!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 9 Aug 2002 09:59:42
>+0200 (METDST), "" download (Jim Prewett) " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> rt> I built an rpm from the .spec file in the distribution as noone has yet to
> rt> release an rpm for 0.9.6e (to my knowledge). When I try to install the
> rt> rpms (all of the openssl binary rpms and a couple layers of
> rt> dependencies) I get:
> rt>
> rt> libssl.so.2 is needed by lynx-2.8.4-18
> rt> libcrypto.so.2 is needed by mutt-1.2.5.1-1
> rt> libssl.so.2 is needed by mutt-1.2.5.1-1
> rt> libcrypto.so.2 is needed by nss_ldap-189-2
> rt> libssl.so.2 is needed by nss_ldap-189-2
> rt> libcrypto.so.2 is needed by openldap-2.0.23-4
> rt> libssl.so.2 is needed by openldap-2.0.23-4
> rt> libcrypto.so.2 is needed by openldap-clients-2.0.23-4
> rt> libssl.so.2 is needed by openldap-clients-2.0.23-4
> rt> libcrypto.so.2 is needed by pidentd-3.0.14-5
> rt> libcrypto.so.2 is needed by pine-4.44-7
> rt> libssl.so.2 is needed by pine-4.44-7
> rt> libcrypto.so.2 is needed by python-1.5.2-38
> rt> libssl.so.2 is needed by python-1.5.2-38
> rt>
> rt> That list is actually much longer, but I thought i'd spare you those
> rt> details.
> rt>
> rt> It is my belief that the .spec file should be changed like this:
> rt>
> rt> [root@azul openssl-0.9.6e]# diff -u openssl.spec openssl.spec.orig
> rt> --- openssl.spec Thu Aug 8 16:18:20 2002
> rt> +++ openssl.spec.orig Thu Aug 8 16:28:57 2002
> rt> @@ -14,8 +14,6 @@
> rt> Copyright: Freely distributable
> rt> Group: System Environment/Libraries
> rt> Provides: SSL
> rt> -Provides: libssl.so.2
> rt> -Provides: libcrypto.so.2
> rt> URL: http://www.openssl.org/
> rt> Packager: Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> rt> BuildRoot: /var/tmp/%{name}-%{version}-root
> rt>
> rt> I've only added that it "Provides" libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2.
>
> Actually, I think people from RedHat asked us to avoid precisely that
> change.
>
> Basically, don't do that unless you know *very well* what you're
> doing.
>
> --
> Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
> \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
> Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
>
> Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
> See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
>
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
