We won't change our openssl.spec, so I'm going to resolve this ticket.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Aug 10 00:01:22 2002]: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 9 Aug > 2002 18:46:24 +0200 (METDST), "" download (Jim Prewett) " via RT" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > rt> I'm sorry to bother you again, but check this out: > rt> > rt> http://www.redhat.com/swr/i686/openssl-0.9.6b-18.i686_dp.html > rt> > rt> Which says: > rt> > rt> Provides > rt> The following virtual packages are provided in this package. > rt> > rt> openssl libcrypto.so.2 > rt> libssl.so.2 openssl > > Those are made with a different openssl.spec, *made by RedHat*. > They've done quite a bit of work with that before OpenSSL had any > shared library support at all. I don't recall the specific details, > and will probably not have the time to investigate further before the > end of september. All I know is that there have been some reports > saying that trying to replace libcrypto.so.2 and libssl.so.2 with > something that one has compiled oneself just doesn't work. > > It's possible this has changed. > > Unfortunately, I'm not a RedHat user, and I don't have any RedHat > system to play with, so I can't try doing this myself. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
