At 02:14 AM 1/9/2003 +0100, you wrote: >[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 8 22:09:03 2003]: > > > <html> > > <body> > >Please don't post using HTML...
Sorry, I did not know that I had. Wasn't this post from the tracker on the OpenSSL site? If not, it must be some setting I have accidentally on in Eudora or something I copied and pasted without knowing it was in HTML. Again, my apologies. (If it is Eudora, then this should also have the same problem ;P). I think it is the styled signature from Eudora..will fix if so. > > Version 0.9.7 release version from Dec 31, 2002 > > Compiled using MSVC6 sp6 with Masm > >Where is SP6 for MSVC6? I can only see SP5 on MS site... Typo..it is SP5. > > OS: Windows XP Home<br><br> > > When PEM_read_X509 is called in certain circumstances you get an > > unhandled exception. I thought it was universal, but I found a test > > case > > in the "how to reproduce" below that did not crash. > > NOTE: > > The same bug may be the cause of the segmentation fault bugs listed > > (408 > > and 430) when trying to use openssl to convert PEM certificates on > > Unix.<br><br> > > This bug has been posted by several people on the > > mailing.openssl.users > > list, but I have not seen a reply, nor did I see it listed in the > > tracker's current bug list.<br><br> > > It is easy to replicate using the tunala demo. Run the first > > example using the input parameters:<br> > > <font face="Courier New, Courier"><x- > > tab> </x-tab>./tunala > > -listen localhost:8080 -proxy localhost:8081 -cacert CA.pem -cert > > A-client.pem -out_totals -v_peer -v_strict<br><br> > > </font>However, if you remove the "-cert A-client.pem" and > > leave the "-cacert CA.pem" it does not crash.<br><br> > > <x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep> > > Michael Hunley<br> > > Senior Engineer<br> > > PocketPurchase, Inc. </body> > > </html> > > > >The issue of various things crashing under Win32 is raised quite often. >In almost all cases its the multithreaded DLL runtime issue (see FAQ). No, all code was compiled with multi-threaded DLL in the code generation tab. If that is incorrect I get a much earlier crash. >Assuming that isn't the case I've also just been tracing the cause of a >problem with VC++ SP4 with the processor pack. > >It was giving incorrect results for 192 and 256 bit AES and different >results entirely with the same keys and the 'enc' command line program. > >Whereas on XP home on my setup VC++ 6.0 with SP3 is fine. I haven't been >able to check out SP5 or the processor pack myself but it looks like >some kind of compiler bug. Quite likely...MSVC is known to have quite a few. I haven't delved into the build settings for the libs yet, what kind of optimizations are turned on? >Steve. michael ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
