On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:10:55PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 9 Jan 2003 17:05:12 >+0100, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > vinschen> Btw., does anybody have an idea where a symbol ".RC4_end" could come from? > > crypto/rc4/asm/rx86unix.cpp in my case (on Linux)... > > I've applied your patches, and will commit them promptly. Please > check the next snapshot.
Thanks, I just found out that the symbol comes from rx86unix.cpp in my case, too. What I don't understand is the following. crypto/rc4/Makefile.ssl contains the following: RC4_ENC=rc4_enc.o # or use #RC4_ENC=asm/rx86-elf.o #RC4_ENC=asm/rx86-out.o #RC4_ENC=asm/rx86-sol.o #RC4_ENC=asm/rx86bdsi.o Even though it's supposed to build rc4_enc.o to get the RC4 function(s), it builds asm/rx86-out.o instead. However, I found out, that the linker problem disappears if I build the libraries using rc4_enc.o instead of asm/rx86-out.o. Frankly, I have NO idea why! Until I found a solution for that linker problem (which is a linker bug, apparently) I'd like to build the Cygwin version using rc4_enc.o. How can I do that most cleanly? Thanks in advance, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Red Hat, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]