On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:50:41AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:38:04 +0100 (MET), "Andy
> Polyakov via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> rt>
> rt> > Now, the really cool thing would be if someone (you?) could provide us
> rt> > with some sh code that identifies 64bit HP/UX so we could set that up
> rt> > in the script 'config'.
> rt>
> rt> ??? 'config' tells apart 32- and 64-bit HP/UX kernels since long time
> rt> ago. Look for 'getconf KERNEL_BITS'.
>
> Oh? So how come 64-bit people get a build that tries to go for
> 32-bit? What have we missed? I haven't looked yet, but I might
> tonight, if I remember...
Actually the problem doesn't seem to be the kernel but the compiler
used. The original requestor uses a gcc version 3.3.2. The 32/64 bit
decision is made by running the GCC in question and looking for
__LP64__ in the output (lines 410-418 in 0.9.7-CVS). Maybe running a
64bit compiler on a 32bit kernel does not correctly determine which
target should be used. (Maybe it isn't a good idea anyway.)
I suppose the original requestor (living in another timezone)
can clarify this a bit later.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
