On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Lutz Jaenicke <l...@lutz-jaenicke.de> wrote: > Hi Kyle, > > thank you very much for reports, they are currently sitting in the > moderation queue. I would kindly ask you and other testers to either > * send success messages to the list with just the platform mentioned > * send failures to openssl-bugs (or rt which is an alias) with a suitable > subject line exposing the platform and type of problem > "Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta1 released" is not too useful as it will end up in > many open tickets all having the same non-informative subject. > > Thank you very much, > Lutz
Hi Lutz, The problem with 'just the platform mentioned' is that there are two separate types of platforms on OSX -- 32 bit and 64 bit. I tested the default configuration on each. In addition, I also tested the experimental-jpake, enable-rfc3779, experimental-store, and basically all the other options I had available, in separate tests (both 32- and 64-bit). I'd figured that you'd have the ability to parse the configuration lines so that you could identify the options in use, the platform, and any combination which resulted in a test failure -- and that more information would be easier to diagnose problems with than less. Which list should I send success reports to? The body will need to include the compiler, the Configure options, and platform at the very least; that's a bit too much to fit into an appropriate Subject. (Or am I taking the concept of a proper, comprehensive test matrix too seriously for the OpenSSL team's liking?) -Kyle H ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
