On 1/9/2012 7:38 AM, Steve Marquess wrote: > > It is not relevant ... an attempt to deal with a Microsoft Windows > issue. We have since identified a better work-around that does not > involve changes to the module code. > > Since we're probably going to be asked, here's the issue: we found that > the Windows based compilations would occasionally fail when attempting > to perform successive operations on files. For instance, 1) link > executable, 2) run executable, 3) delete executable, 4) (re)link > executable would fail at step 4 even though the file did not exist > (previous unlink was successful). We traced the problem to the bundled > Windows Defender service; stopping or replacing that avoids the > problem.
Aaargh!!! Thanks; my sleep(2) hack can be put to bed :) ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
