>>> thanks! Was away last week and so didn't have a chance to try fixing this.
>>>
>>> I'll patch that it and run the tests against it.
>>
>> I've run out of time tracking this down for today, but I got to the
>> point where setting the Jacobian coordinates:
>>
>> X: C4EB2994C09557B400FF6A543CFB257F945E86FE3DF1D32A8128F32927666A8F
>> Y: 3D5283F8F10F559AE5310005005F321B28D2D699F3E01F179F91AC6660013328
>> Z: F97FD7E6757991A2C7E0C2488FF3C54E58030BCACF3FB95954FD3EF211C24631
>>
>> and multiplying that point by
>> 2269520AFB46450398DE95AE59DDBDC1D42B8B7030F81BCFEF12D819C1D678DD
>> results in the affine point:
>>
>> x: 4BBC2813F69EF6A4D3E69E2832E9A9E97FF59F8C136DCDBD9509BC685FF337FD
>> y: BDCB623715CE2D983CFC2776C6EED4375454BE2C88932D43856906C1DC7A0BD7
>>
>> However, I believe that the result should be:
>>
>> x: C2910AA0216D12DE30C5573CCFC4116546E3091DC1E9EC8604F634185CE40863
>> y: C9071E13D688C305CE179C6168DD9066657BC6CDC1639A44B68DF7F1E0A40EDF
> 
> I do get the latter...

... in master, and I get the former in 1.0.2. Looking into it...



______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           majord...@openssl.org

Reply via email to