On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Adam Langley <a...@google.com> wrote: > Thanks. So far that version is good to ~1B random tests. I'll leave it > going until Monday.
It's good for ~6B random tests. Of course, that's not as compelling for 64-bit code as it would be for 32-bit, but I think we can safely say that there aren't any low-hanging bugs left. Thanks Andy. Cheers AGL _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list openssl-dev@openssl.org https://mta.opensslfoundation.net/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
