> replacing their implementation with another one (such as OpenSSL).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Is that what is normally done? It is easiest since my OpenSSL version is
>working. But is that legal?
Yes it is what is normally done. Your best way to answer the legal question
is to
get a copy of the license from RSADSI and have a lawyer read it for you.
>It looks like BSAFE covers all
>the same areas as OpenSSL does and there is no need to connect them - one
can
>use BSAFE for everything.
This is incorrect. BSAFE probably does all the same crypto as OpenSSL, but
you
can't use BSAFE "for everything" if that includes the SSL protocol. RSADSI
does
have an SSL product, if you want that. :)
>I do not mind using BSAFE if it is reasonable.
The "conventional wisdom" is that it's easier and "better" to use the
OpenSSL codebase.
I am not a lawyer.
/r$
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
