From: Marko Asplund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
aspa> On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Bear Giles wrote:
aspa>
aspa> > ...
aspa> > Long term, it would be best to create an abstraction layer that
aspa> > would allow any backend to be used. I can think of multiple
aspa> > common storage formats: text files, DBM files, LDAP, RDBMS. But
aspa> > that's definitely not a 0.9.7 task!
aspa>
aspa> why not use an existing database abstraction layer such as
aspa> libdbi or ODBC?
>From an OpenSSL point of view, that's uninteresting. What is
interesting is to offer a layer above that, designed to handle the
objects handled by OpenSSL: certificates, keys, crls,...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
