Yes, Viktor... you are right. Two certificates with the same keys is ...
as you say....
One of these days, I'll figure out how to write what I really mean, instead
of assuming that all readers have the same context as I do.
And that "retirement" was (how shall I put it) ... non-voluntary.
At 07:20 PM 6/16/2005, you wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 06:33:53PM -0700, david wrote:
> Like the commentator, I'm also a little guy. In my case, I'm a retired
guy
> who got his intro to this stuff from Entrust. I got convinced that their
> two (or more) -certificate solution was right, based upon the following:
>
You say (loosely) two "certificates", but you reall mean two key pairs
with a corresponding certificate for each public key. Two certificates
for the same key (signing cert vs. encryption cert) are snake oil at
best.
--
Viktor.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
