On 2007.05.16 at 13:30:12 +0200, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:

> 
> In OpenSSL 0.9.8 and later at least you set the -crl_check option or
> -crl_check_all. The certificates and CRL(s) for verification can be supplied
> in a single file using -CAfile or a directory using -CApath.

But it is still undocumented in the current snapshot.

Is it a good idea to run some automated script on all *.c files in apps
to find list of all options for all command and then on *.pod in
doc/apps to find which ones are not documented?

Really there are three lists to compare - list of options, actually
recognized by command, list of options reported by utility when invalid
option specified and list of options, documented in the man page.

Same question about API documentation.

There is list of functions/macros actually implemented, list
of functions/macros in ssl(3) manpage,
list of functions actually described in the pod documentation
and list of links to the documentation pages, which are created during
installation. 

And simular problem for libcrypto functions, which is even worse because
summary man pages such as x509(3) do not have comprehensive list of
functions, and some big parts of library (such as asn1 handling
routines) even don't have summary man page.

> 
> Steve.
> --
> Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage
> OpenSSL project core developer and freelance consultant.
> Funding needed! Details on homepage.
> Homepage: http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
> Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to