Don't regret it, it wasn't that bad ;)
--
Erwann ABALEA
Le 13/12/2013 20:39, andrew cooke a écrit :
sorry, that was a bad joke i now regret sending. andrew
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:01:23PM -0300, Andrew Cooke wrote:
it dpends how many characters differ when sorted.
in this case:
ECDHE-ECDSA-DES-CBC3-SHA -> ----3AABCCCCDDDEEEEHHSSS
* *** **
ECDHE-ECDSA-3DES-EDE-SHA -> ----3AACCDDDDEEEEEEHHSSS
you can see (marked by *) that 6 characters don't match.
now 6 is a triangular number, but the length of the entire cipher suite is 24,
which isn't triangule (the closest is 21).
so they're only going to inter-operate on tuesdays.
andrew
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:30:02PM +0100, Walter H. wrote:
On 12.12.2013 14:16, Erwann Abalea wrote:
It's not strange.
You removed the RSA-* from client side, the result is that the
server can't match anything in common between what the client
proposed and what the server accepts. The error you get has been
sent by the server.
The server is capable of ciphers DHE-* and others;
the list is quite longer than the avaiable ciphers of the client ...,
so I think this is quite strange ...
openssl ciphers -V
shows e.g. ECDHE-ECDSA-DES-CBC3-SHA
the site https://cc.dcsec.uni-hannover.de/ shows this:
ECDHE-ECDSA-3DES-EDE-SHA
are these the same cipher suites but two confusing names?
Walter
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
