On 07/17/2013 10:54 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
Hi fellows,

Currently we're implementing the BP 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/utilization-aware-scheduling. The 
main idea is to have an extensible plugin framework on nova-compute where every 
plugin can get different metrics(e.g. CPU utilization, memory cache 
utilization, network bandwidth, etc.) to store into the DB, and the 
nova-scheduler will use that data from DB for scheduling decision.

Currently we adds a new table to store all the metric data and have 
nova-scheduler join loads the new table with the compute_nodes table to get all 
the data(https://review.openstack.org/35759). Someone is concerning about the 
performance penalty of the join load operation when there are many metrics data 
stored in the DB for every single compute node. Don suggested adding a new 
column in the current compute_nodes table in DB, and put all metric data into a 
dictionary key/value format and store the json encoded string of the dictionary 
into that new column in DB.

I'm just wondering which way has less performance impact, join load with a new 
table with quite a lot of rows, or json encode/decode a dictionary with a lot 
of key/value pairs?

Thanks,
-Lianhao

I'm really confused. Why are we talking about collecting host metrics in nova when we've got a whole project to do that in ceilometer? I think utilization based scheduling would be a great thing, but it really out to be interfacing with ceilometer to get that data. Storing it again in nova (or even worse collecting it a second time in nova) seems like the wrong direction.

I think there was an equiv patch series at the end of Grizzly that was pushed out for the same reasons.

If there is a reason ceilometer can't be used in this case, we should have that discussion here on the list. Because my initial reading of this blueprint and the code patches is that it partially duplicates ceilometer function, which we definitely don't want to do. Would be happy to be proved wrong on that.

        -Sean

--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to