On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Nicholas Chase wrote: > > > On 10/1/2013 10:53 AM, Michael Basnight wrote: > >> Well this sucks. Im not sure im a fan of renaming it because of the previous >> existence of a package. Renaming is not fun. Ill let the more experienced >> openstack peoples help decide on this... > > Certainly it's not fun, but wouldn't it be easier to do it NOW, rather than > later?
Hah, well, it begs the question, why are we _not_ namespacing all openstack packages. If you look @ the rpms, they are all namespaced [1]. IMHO, i wouldnt mind seeing openstack-blah packages. And let me reiterate, im not sure changing our name _again_ is the way to go because of a conflicting debian package. This wont be a problem for the rpms, because they are namespaced (openstack-trove). [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openstack-nova
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
