On May 30, 2017, at 9:08 PM, Zhenguo Niu <niu.zgli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There would be a collision if nova and mogan consume the same ironic nodes > cluster, as both of them will see all the available node resources. So if > someone wants to choose mogan for baremetal compute management, the > recommended deployment is Mogan+Ironic for baremetals and Nova+Libvirt for > VMs, this way we treat baremetals and vms as different compute resources. In > a cloud with both vms and baremetals, it's more clear to have different set > of APIs to manage them if users really care about what resources they got > instead of just the performance. We also create a mogan horizon plugin which > adds separated baremetal servers panel[1]. So Mogan does not use the placement service for tracking resources? -- Ed Leafe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
