On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Ed Leafe <e...@leafe.com> wrote: > On May 30, 2017, at 9:08 PM, Zhenguo Niu <niu.zgli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > There would be a collision if nova and mogan consume the same ironic > nodes cluster, as both of them will see all the available node resources. > So if someone wants to choose mogan for baremetal compute management, the > recommended deployment is Mogan+Ironic for baremetals and Nova+Libvirt for > VMs, this way we treat baremetals and vms as different compute resources. > In a cloud with both vms and baremetals, it's more clear to have different > set of APIs to manage them if users really care about what resources they > got instead of just the performance. We also create a mogan horizon plugin > which adds separated baremetal servers panel[1]. > > So Mogan does not use the placement service for tracking resources? >
as placement is not splitted out from nova now, and there would be users who only want a baremetal cloud, so we don't add resources to placement yet, but it's easy for us to turn to placement to match the node type with mogan flavors. > > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Best Regards, Zhenguo Niu
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
