On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:04:58PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Tony Breeds wrote: > > An extension to this would be to check for other items in the same boat. > > I wrote [1] to find anything in the openstack namespace that isn't a > > service and has something that looks like a date based release on pypi. > > [...] > > Thanks for computing the list. Unpublishing is a bit of a trade-off -- > in the networking-hyperv case the pain resulting from the people using > pip to install it (and complaining about the situation) ends up being > bigger than the pain of unpublishing it... So I'm not sure we should > necessarily proactively unpublish everything in the same boat > (especially if nobody asks for it). In particular, we should definitely > *not* do it for anything that's not an official OpenStack deliverable.
Okay I could tweak the tool to only check for repos that are in openstack/governance:reference/projects.yaml but it looks like you've already done that translation in your head ;P > That leaves us with: > > Official libraries (python-congressclient, python-designateclient) for > which I think we should proactively fix them ASAP. > > Other official things (mistral-extra, networking-odl, murano-dashboard, > networking-hyperv, networking-midonet, sahara-image-elements, > freezer-api, murano-agent, mistral-dashboard, sahara-dashboard) for > which we should fix them if pip is a reasonable way of installing them > (after asking the local PTL if that's alright). Cool. If we don't get any traction here can use the PTG to find PTLs ;P I assume it's infra that needs to do the actual unpublish? Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
