So, I believe the general consensus is that the easiest thing to do is to unpublish the 2015.1.0 version from pypi, with which I also agree.
Even if someone actually needs the Kilo version (it's a very old branch, very few people still use it, at most), it can still be done via [1]: pip install git+http://github.com/openstack/networking-hyperv@2015.1.0#networking-hyperv or pip install http://tarballs.openstack.org/networking-hyperv/networking_hyperv-2015.1.0-py2-none-any.whl If someone *actually* needs it on pypi, We could publish a 0.x.y version, but I don't think it will be necessary. Also, @Tony, using upper-constraints wouldn't work when installing networking-hyperv won't really help, as it isn't defined there. networking-hyperv is not a requirement in any project, it's only needed by neutron if the "hyperv" mechanism_driver is used. Thanks @all for your opinions! Best regards, Claudiu Belu ________________________________________ From: Jeremy Stanley [fu...@yuggoth.org] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 3:05 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [relmgt] Libraries published to pypi with YYYY.X.Z versions On 2017-08-31 15:21:19 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > I assume it's infra that needs to do the actual unpublish? We're the ones with the most consistent access to all of them, though in a majority of cases there's at least one other account with sufficient access to do the same (it just tends to vary by team and origination timeframe). So, yes, probably easiest to give the Infra team a list once it's been confirmed. -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
