> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular > meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have > targeted topical meetings over regular meetings.
Agree with this. That said, please include me (efried) in whatever shakes out. On 01/08/2018 02:12 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in >> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community >> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form >> a Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community >> to communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other >> related SIGs. >> >> The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar >> interested parties and establish an official channel. Currently we >> have already OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes >> discussion (e.g. [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further >> help such activities and better align the resource mgmt mechanism, >> especially the data modeling between the two communities (or even more >> communities with similar desire). >> >> I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received >> positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that >> people could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For >> example for me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of >> acceleration[2]. >> >> If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find >> a efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary >> meetings and other undue burdens. > > +1 > > From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at > 1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting > issues are typically discussed. > > Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource > providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing > status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday. > > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular > meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have > targeted topical meetings over regular meetings. > > Best, > -jay > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev