Hi Eric, Glad to count you in :)
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Eric Fried <openst...@fried.cc> wrote: > > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if > > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events > > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular > > meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have > > targeted topical meetings over regular meetings. > > Agree with this. That said, please include me (efried) in whatever > shakes out. > > On 01/08/2018 02:12 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in > >> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community > >> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form > >> a Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community > >> to communicate with Kubernetes Resource Management WG[0] and other > >> related SIGs. > >> > >> The formation of the SIG is to provide a gathering of similar > >> interested parties and establish an official channel. Currently we > >> have already OpenStack developers actively participating in kubernetes > >> discussion (e.g. [1]), we would hope the ResMgmt SIG could further > >> help such activities and better align the resource mgmt mechanism, > >> especially the data modeling between the two communities (or even more > >> communities with similar desire). > >> > >> I have floated the idea with Jay Pipes and Chris Dent and received > >> positive feedback. The SIG will have a co-lead structure so that > >> people could spearheading in the area they are most interested in. For > >> example for me as Cyborg dev, I will mostly lead in the area of > >> acceleration[2]. > >> > >> If you are also interested please reply to this thread, and let's find > >> a efficient way to form this SIG. Efficient means no extra unnecessary > >> meetings and other undue burdens. > > > > +1 > > > > From the Nova perspective, the scheduler meeting (which is Mondays at > > 1400 UTC) is the primary meeting where resource tracking and accounting > > issues are typically discussed. > > > > Chris Dent has done a fabulous job recording progress on the resource > > providers and placement work over the last couple releases by issuing > > status emails to the openstack-dev@ mailing list each Friday. > > > > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if > > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events > > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular > > meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have > > targeted topical meetings over regular meetings. > > > > Best, > > -jay > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > ______________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev