> I would like to realize moving swift_middleware.py from the ceilometer
> package to
> the ceilometerclient package. For me it is very difficult to convince users
> of
> installing the ceilometer package on Proxy Nodes for just using the swift
> middleware
> because of maintenance costs. Operators in users must check security patches
> for
> installed packages on Proxy Nodes even if these are not used on the nodes.
this idea sounds so familiar. i feel like i may have tried to move this in the
past but gave up. i actually prefer having the middleware reside in
ceilometerclient... it really doesn't make sense for the entire ceilometer
package to be pulled in for just a middleware although i feel like that might
require the oslo.messaging feature as well
could you create a spec[1] and we can maybe hash out idea there.
[1]https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer-specs
cheers,gord
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
