From: Jordan Pittier <jordan.pitt...@scality.com<mailto:jordan.pitt...@scality.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 1:47 PM To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] CI report formatting (citrix / hyperv / vmware )
Hi On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net<mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote: Currently Citrix, HyperV, and VMWare CI systems reporting on Nova patches have a different formatting than the standard that Jenkins and other systems are using: * test-name-no-spaces http://link.to/result<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__link.to_result&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=EtHYlIXfK33bYsGf2k8XbFtgWlkcm_VdZCrFHTLEdiE&s=5SS-txUrD3o8KS3QIaCL3XMBbeCYK5CjmzmuxDda7Oc&e=> : [SUCCESS|FAILURE] some comment about the test I don't want to talk for Citrix, HyperV or VMWare but the "standard" only work if you use Zuul in your CI. I am using a setup based on a Jenkins plugin called gerrit-trigger and there's no way to format the message the way it's expected... This means these systems don't show up in the CI rollup block - http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6514884/screenshot_158.png<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dl.dropbox.com_u_6514884_screenshot-5F158.png&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=EtHYlIXfK33bYsGf2k8XbFtgWlkcm_VdZCrFHTLEdiE&s=nIjYwznh1_8aVBSz-XVEJrpNaMsDfqyekOQ2IhiHTo8&e=> Current the Vmware CI will vote +1 iff the patch has passed on the CI. We can investigate adding this to the CI rollup block. I'd really like that to change. The CI rollup block has been extremely useful in getting the test results of a patch above the fold, and the ability to dig into them clearly. I feel like if any CI system isn't reporting in standard format that's parsible by that, we should probably turn it off. I do not think that we should turn this off. They have value. It would be nice if things were all of the same format, which I guess that this is the intension of the mail. Lets all try and make an effort to work towards this goal. What's fair warning to get these systems postings into the standard format? It realistically should be a very quick change by them, but will help quite a lot in reviewing code. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dague.net&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=EtHYlIXfK33bYsGf2k8XbFtgWlkcm_VdZCrFHTLEdiE&s=zvLmRDIA_kZRg-RYLMhXhNfvNXq3Ni_9LKyJYxD5Nio&e=> __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
