On 03/25/2015 09:03 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > From: Jordan Pittier <jordan.pitt...@scality.com > <mailto:jordan.pitt...@scality.com>> > Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> > Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 1:47 PM > To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] CI report formatting (citrix / > hyperv / vmware ) > > Hi > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net > <mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote: > > Currently Citrix, HyperV, and VMWare CI systems reporting on Nova > patches have a different formatting than the standard that Jenkins and > other systems are using: > > * test-name-no-spaces http://link.to/result > > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__link.to_result&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=EtHYlIXfK33bYsGf2k8XbFtgWlkcm_VdZCrFHTLEdiE&s=5SS-txUrD3o8KS3QIaCL3XMBbeCYK5CjmzmuxDda7Oc&e=> > : [SUCCESS|FAILURE] some > comment about the test > > I don't want to talk for Citrix, HyperV or VMWare but the "standard" > only work if you use Zuul in your CI. I am using a setup based on a > Jenkins plugin called gerrit-trigger and there's no way to format the > message the way it's expected... > > > This means these systems don't show up in the CI rollup block - > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6514884/screenshot_158.png > > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dl.dropbox.com_u_6514884_screenshot-5F158.png&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=EtHYlIXfK33bYsGf2k8XbFtgWlkcm_VdZCrFHTLEdiE&s=nIjYwznh1_8aVBSz-XVEJrpNaMsDfqyekOQ2IhiHTo8&e=> > > > Current the Vmware CI will vote +1 iff the patch has passed on the CI. > We can investigate adding this to the CI rollup block. > > > > I'd really like that to change. The CI rollup block has been extremely > useful in getting the test results of a patch above the fold, and the > ability to dig into them clearly. I feel like if any CI system isn't > reporting in standard format that's parsible by that, we should probably > turn it off. > > > I do not think that we should turn this off. They have value. It would > be nice if things were all of the same format, which I guess that this > is the intension of the mail. Lets all try and make an effort to work > towards this goal.
Right, honestly, I don't want these turned off, I want them reporting in a more standard format. But I do think if they don't report in a standard format it will cause problems and add to them being ignored. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev