On 03/26/2015 03:41 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > > On 3/25/15, 3:21 PM, "Sean Dague" <s...@dague.net> wrote: > >> On 03/25/2015 09:03 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >>> >>> From: Jordan Pittier <jordan.pitt...@scality.com >>> <mailto:jordan.pitt...@scality.com>> >>> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> >>> Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 1:47 PM >>> To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> >>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] CI report formatting (citrix / >>> hyperv / vmware ) >>> >>> Hi >>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net >>> <mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Currently Citrix, HyperV, and VMWare CI systems reporting on Nova >>> patches have a different formatting than the standard that Jenkins >>> and >>> other systems are using: >>> >>> * test-name-no-spaces >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__link.to_result&d=AwIF >>> aQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYB >>> k8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=WR2WbwJKtngJUjJEo4yFahEnv7RtC3NDaDsZFuzSukw&s=2Jr >>> ZtoZF3o4ThkkR34bJH77FMeEorM65K2FQR9pKSuM&e= >>> >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__link.to_result&d=AwM >>> FaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JY >>> Bk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=EtHYlIXfK33bYsGf2k8XbFtgWlkcm_VdZCrFHTLEdiE&s=5S >>> S-txUrD3o8KS3QIaCL3XMBbeCYK5CjmzmuxDda7Oc&e=> >>> : [SUCCESS|FAILURE] some >>> comment about the test >>> >>> I don't want to talk for Citrix, HyperV or VMWare but the "standard" >>> only work if you use Zuul in your CI. I am using a setup based on a >>> Jenkins plugin called gerrit-trigger and there's no way to format the >>> message the way it's expected... >>> >>> >>> This means these systems don't show up in the CI rollup block - >>> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dl.dropbox.com_u_6514 >>> 884_screenshot-5F158.png&d=AwIFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNt >>> Xt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=WR2WbwJKtngJUjJEo4 >>> yFahEnv7RtC3NDaDsZFuzSukw&s=47UEXfmar4lGrIce8bEgHwvws7Lw0DPGWdEzPSDDAXQ&e >>> = >>> >>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dl.dropbox.com_u_651 >>> 4884_screenshot-5F158.png&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMN >>> tXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=EtHYlIXfK33bYsGf2 >>> k8XbFtgWlkcm_VdZCrFHTLEdiE&s=nIjYwznh1_8aVBSz-XVEJrpNaMsDfqyekOQ2IhiHTo8& >>> e=> >>> >>> >>> Current the Vmware CI will vote +1 iff the patch has passed on the CI. >>> We can investigate adding this to the CI rollup block. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'd really like that to change. The CI rollup block has been >>> extremely >>> useful in getting the test results of a patch above the fold, and >>> the >>> ability to dig into them clearly. I feel like if any CI system isn't >>> reporting in standard format that's parsible by that, we should >>> probably >>> turn it off. >>> >>> >>> I do not think that we should turn this off. They have value. It would >>> be nice if things were all of the same format, which I guess that this >>> is the intension of the mail. Lets all try and make an effort to work >>> towards this goal. >> >> Right, honestly, I don't want these turned off, I want them reporting in >> a more standard format. But I do think if they don't report in a >> standard format it will cause problems and add to them being ignored. > > Vmware Nova CI has been updated. Please see > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167713/ as an example.
Great, thank you. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev