On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 04/29/2015 01:25 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote: >> My take on the “where does it fit” yardstick: >> >> Does it stand on its own and add value? Then consider it a standalone >> project, *or* part of neutron if you and neutron agree that it fits. >> >> Does it *require* neutron to be useful? Then consider having it under >> the neutron umbrella/stadium/tent/yurt. > > ...arena/coliseum/dome... > > That's a nice summary. Thanks. :-) > > -- > Russell Bryant > >
By this definition, nearly all standalone SDN controller would not be classified as neutron tent (including OVN by its design doc), because they are not born for neutron at all. It seems that the only exception is ofagent. While most hardware MD can be treated as under neutron tent, for they just do one thing: driver hardware on behalf on neutron. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
