On 2015-04-29 16:46:13 -0700 (-0700), Joe Gordon wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> [...] > >> 1) Project governance has moved to a "big tent" model [1]. The vast > >> majority of projects that used to be in Stackforge are being folded in > > > I think the phrase 'vast majority' is misleading, there are still a lot of > projects on stackforge. [...]
Even the word "majority" is incorrect, at least for the moment. Ignoring openstack-attic and stackforge-attic, of the 627 non-retired git repositories hosted in our infrastructure, 55% are stackforge and 45% are openstack.*. ssh -p 29418 review.openstack.org gerrit ls-projects \ |cut -d/ -f1|sort|uniq -c The majority (by any sense of the word) are currently still squarely stackforge. Once all the chef cookbooks and puppet modules switch then the percentages there invert, but I have to agree with Joe that it's by no means "vast" even then. If all the fuel repos also move then that brings us to a 60/40 split in favor of openstack. Maybe that starts to count as vast? Regardless, the stackforge/networking-.* repos only make up 3% of the total count. -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev