On Tue, Nov 10 2015, Victor Stinner wrote: > It was also proposed to reuse openstackclient or the openstack SDK. I don't > understand how novaclient can use openstackclient, since openstackclient > depends on python-novaclient... The OpenStack SDK project is also a large > library no? (I don't know well the OpenStack SDK project.)
I'd think the idea was rather to reuse openstack-sdk in novaclient, no? There's often confusion about openstackclient and openstack-sdk, so might be the source of that. > I would prefer to move cliutils.py to oslo.utils. Only 3 clients use > cliutils.py but don't depend on oslo.utils yet. The 8 remaining clients using > cliutils.py already depends on oslo.utils. > > An alternative is to create yet another oslo library. But it means creating a > library for a single file of 280 lines. > > What do you think? What about killing it? > On 29 "python-*client" projects, I found 11 clients using cliutils.py: > > python-ceilometerclient We barely use it and I pretty sure we'll kill it in the long run. -- Julien Danjou // Free Software hacker // https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev