On 11/10/2015 07:41 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10 2015, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> Julien, Victor, >> >> How about - oslo.cli = apiclient/*.py + cliutils.py - since we already >> have a spec for a new library for apiclient > > I may be lacking context here, but we built a new complete client > recently (python-gnocchiclient) without apiclient and cliutils at all. > We just used cliff and keystoneauth1. > > So I really doubt we need these legacy libraries nowadays. Isn't the > best option to just let them die and spend efforts moving clients away > From them?
Yes, they should honestly just be cut loose in the client trees, and clients should be encouraged to go the keystoneauth1 / cliff route in the future. 280 lines of code across 11 clients isn't actually that much code, it's 1% of novaclient. It's not really worth building a new library for especially because we don't actually want to encourage people to do this any more. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev