On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 15:42:18 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/06/2016 03:28 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Dec 6, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:

I would prefer:

GET /resource_providers?resources=DISK_GB:40,VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:2048

to "group" the resources parameter together. When we add in trait
lookups, we're going to want a way to clearly delineate between
resource classes and traits other than just knowing resource classes
are ALL_CAPS...

GET /resource_providers?resources=DISK_GB:40,VCPU:2,MEMORY_MB:2048
     &required=storage:ssd,hw:cpu:x86:avx2
     &preferred=virt:hyperv:gen2

OK, that’s fine. The URI path is still just 126 characters, well below
the limit of around 8K. It still seems anything but scary.

Oh, absolutely, I wasn't arguing about length of URI or anything.

To be clear, I could either go the above route or even do a POST
/resource_providers that returns a list of resource providers instead of
creating a resource provider. Don't mind either way.

But, we should definitely agree on which this is going to be ASAP.

Last time I was aware of the discussion, I thought that sophisticated queries for a list of resource providers would involve specifying a structured JSON payload. That is where I don't tend to think a query string in the URI is so usable. Are we assuming user queries will be relatively simple?

From what I recall, the ideas were:

1. GET with non-JSON query string if simple, else GET with JSON body (which is not covered by HTTP spec)

2. GET with JSON query string to cover both simple and sophisticated queries

3. POST with JSON body to a /resource_providers/list URI to cover both simple and sophisticated queries

Which option are we talking about now? 1? Or a version of it where queries are assumed to be simple and no JSON structure at all?

-melanie

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to