On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Anna Taraday <akamyshnik...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up! > > I was assuming that from Ocata everyone should switch from usage 'old' > TunnelTypeDriver to updated one.
I am not sure. We haven't marked the 'old' one with any deprecation warnings, did we? For Ocata at least, both classes will be available for use. In Pike, we can look at cleaning up the old class (either through deprecation warning and removal in Q; or using NeutronLibImpact process). > > Revering both back to session means reverting all refactor and this is not > in line with enginefacade work and as I remember some of OVO patches we > waiting for this refactor too. > > I we can duplicate methods or we can check type of the argument if session > or context and proceed differently. I will push patch for this ASAP. > I reviewed the patch, I think it's a good path forward, thanks. Ihar __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
