OK, this makes sense. Thanks for clarification! On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:50 PM Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Anna Taraday > <akamyshnik...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > Thanks for bringing this up! > > > > I was assuming that from Ocata everyone should switch from usage 'old' > > TunnelTypeDriver to updated one. > > I am not sure. We haven't marked the 'old' one with any deprecation > warnings, did we? For Ocata at least, both classes will be available > for use. In Pike, we can look at cleaning up the old class (either > through deprecation warning and removal in Q; or using > NeutronLibImpact process). > > > > > Revering both back to session means reverting all refactor and this is > not > > in line with enginefacade work and as I remember some of OVO patches we > > waiting for this refactor too. > > > > I we can duplicate methods or we can check type of the argument if > session > > or context and proceed differently. I will push patch for this ASAP. > > > > I reviewed the patch, I think it's a good path forward, thanks. > > Ihar > -- Regards, Ann Taraday
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev