Tristan Cacqueray <tdeca...@redhat.com> writes: > Hi, > > With the nodepool-drivers[0] spec approved, I started to hack a quick > implementation[1]. Well I am not very familiar with the nodepool/zookeeper > architecture, thus this implementation may very well be missing important > bits... The primary goal is to be able to run ZuulV3 with static nodes, > comments and feedbacks are most welcome.
I've taken a general look and I think this is heading in the right direction. We should ask David Shrewsbury to look at it when he gets a chance, and Tobias as well when he's back. Thanks! > Moreover, assuming this isn't too off-track, I'd like to propose an > OpenContainer and a libvirt driver to diversify Test environment. I think the most important thing is the static node driver -- that's part of the original scope for Zuul v3, and we need it for functional parity with v2. An OpenContainer driver sounds fine to me, but I'm reluctant to add a libvirt driver at the moment -- there is a lot of potential overlap with OpenStack, as well as other potential drivers such as linch-pin. Maybe there are some compelling reasons to do so, but I'd rather defer that for a while until we establish some guidelines around in-tree drivers. Since it's a scope expansion, we should consider anything beyond the static driver to be a lower priority while we work to get Zuul v3 finished. -Jim _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra