Tristan Cacqueray <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > Now that the zuulv3 release is approaching, please find below a > follow-up on this spec. > > The current code could use one more patch[0] to untangle the common > config from the openstack provider specific bits. The patch often needs > to be manualy rebased. Since it looks like a good addition to what > has already been merged, I think we should consider it for the release. > > Then it seems like new drivers are listed as 'future work' on the > zuul roadmap board, though they are still up for review[1]. > They are fairly self contained and they don't require further > zuul or nodepool modification, thus they could be easily part of a > future release indeed. > > However I think we should re-evaluate them for the release one more > time since they enable using zuul without an OpenStack cloud. > Anyway I remain available to do the legwork. > > Regards, > -Tristan > > [0]: https://review.openstack.org/488384 > [1]: https://review.openstack.org/468624
I think getting the static driver in to the 3.0 release is reasonable -- most of the work is done, and I think it will make simple or test deployments of Zuul much easier. That can make for a better experience for users trying out Zuul. I'd support moving that to the 3.0 roadmap, but reserving further drivers for later work. Thanks! -Jim _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
