Thanks for your opinion. But I am looking for the real difference between them... - Which one is better support in openstack? - Which one provides better unified storage backend for all openstack storage controllers(cinder, swift and glance)?
On 11/6/14, Adrián Norte Fernández <adr...@bashlines.com> wrote: > I personally find Ceph to be the most mature project and more easily > scalable. > El 06/11/2014 13:40, "Hossein Zabolzadeh" <zabolza...@gmail.com> escribió: > >> Hello there, >> I am doubted to select which storage backend(sheepdog, Ceph or >> GlusterFS) for my openstack production env. I am aware of each project >> itself, but want to know what is the real difference between them when >> used as glance, swift and cinder storage backend? >> Any help appreciated. >> Thanks in advance. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
