On 6 November 2014 13:01, Hossein Zabolzadeh <zabolza...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your opinion. But I am looking for the real difference > between them... > - Which one is better support in openstack? > - Which one provides better unified storage backend for all openstack > storage controllers(cinder, swift and glance)? > I don't think that Gluster or Sheepdog provide a storage back-end capable of providing block storage (cinder) and object storage (swift) back-ends. Only Ceph provides a properly unified back-end for both. Ceph has also been supported for cinder for over two years - it's very mature. The Rados Gateway (Object Storage/Swift Interface) is much more recent, but I have yet to see problems with it - as long as you do acknowledge that it is not Swift.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
