On 1/30/15 1:08 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
Project: A client dealing with the API already knows what project (service) they’re dealing with. Including this in an API error message would be redundant. That’s not necessarily so bad and it could actually be convenient for client logging purposes to have this there.
Is this really true though? When your interaction with nova is being thwarted by a problem with keystone, wouldn't the end user want to see the keystone name in there as a helpful breadcrumb as to where the problem actually lies?
-- -jlk _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
