If this thread has anything clear to me at all, it's that adding *more* people to this discussion isn't going to bring us any closer to an agreement.
Here's a thought: How about we appoint (formally, informally, whatever, it's beside the point) someone (3-4 people tops) to come up with a set of tools and the rest of us just shut up, use the tools, write some cool software and don't waste another full development cycle arguing about stuff we'll never agree on anyway? Yes, I will probably waste a good 10-20 minutes retraining my muscle memory to not type "bzr", but rather "darcs", "hg", "git" or whatever this group comes up with. The alternative is to argue about this for months, wait for something to get built based on this discussion, start using it, wait a couple of weeks until the next mutiny, lather, rinse, repeat. Seriously. Who -- apart from our competitors -- gains anything at all from this? -- Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/ Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/ OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
