On Thursday 17 January 2008 02:37:40 pm Christian Jäger wrote: > It is perfectly normal that an indexing tool is especially active when > building an initial index. Whoever doesn't have the patience to wait > this out and instead uninstalls Beagle instantly cannot really say > anything about its footprint or usefulness IMHO. > > Apple users, for example, just _know_ that their search-tool (Sherlock > or whatever it's called) put quite a load on in the beginning. > > I think removing Beagle would mean a serious regression.
Someone that knows about search tools and required properties should create benchmarks or anything like that. We had almost endless discussion in [EMAIL PROTECTED] with bunch of opinions, and even google search results that should confirm that beagle is nasty resource hog. That contradicts my experience, but except taking under loop google results, where it showed mix of obsolete articles and opinions, I had no much tools to prove my point that beagle is not a problem, at least not in that many cases. I can agree that Beagle is development version, with bugs that can make it chase its tail, but I really can't see, in last couple of months, that it hogs resources. I had literally no 99% CPU usage where beagle would be the culprit, so I can't confirm any claim that tells so. What is needed is some comparative study, with numbers that will describe real situation. -- Regards, Rajko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
