Am Thursday 15 March 2007 schrieb Juergen Weigert: > On Mar 15, 07 14:53:50 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Stanislav Brabec wrote: > > > Hallo. > > > > > > I have just notified, that many people "fix" (i. e. break) their > > > packages to pass QA checks by removing required files instead of fixing > > > them, i. e. removing .desktop files instead of installing icon or > > > fixing Categories, removing gconf schemas instead of correct > > > installation. > > > > If they "fix" or "break" their package what does it help to add a > > comment? It looks like you are proposing that package maintainers have a > > clue ;) > > No. Especially cluelessness needs documentation. > Example: > "# I don't care about this gconf stuff. Remove seems to help." > > This is a very useful comment. > It pinpoints the actual problem that the maintainer has.
Yeah, what good is this comment then? Unless of course the build team sees itself in a position that it has to be too much time, so it wants to verify the clueness of all packager comments. I doubt it. Greetings, Stephan -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
