On Oct 4 2007 17:25, Stephan Kulow wrote: >> I notice, for example, >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 455 5200 66727 Sep 22 00:02 libelf0-devel-0.8.9-17.i586.rpm >> >> while I agree with the new naming scheme (libelf0), I do not for -devel >> packages that cannot reasonably be installed alongside each other. >> Think of libelf0-devel and libelf1-devel which both provided a file with > >libelf-devel conflicts with libelf0-devel. Where is your point?
Ah ok, I did not see libelf-devel since I was looking for lib*[0-9]-devel*.rpm. Ok, I try again, with a better package example. 17:36 ichi:/lnk/fac/i586 > l libcurl* -rw-r--r-- 1 455 5200 147722 Sep 23 14:50 libcurl-devel-7.16.4-16.i586.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 455 5200 90925 Sep 22 02:10 libcurl2-7.11.0-32.i586.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 455 5200 112130 Sep 22 02:19 libcurl3-7.15.5-34.i586.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 455 5200 118337 Sep 23 14:50 libcurl4-7.16.4-16.i586.rpm There is only one -devel package, and not four. And it's called libcurl-devel and not libcurl4-devel. That's good. But not all packages follow the curl scheme, e.g. libxfcegui4: 17:39 ichi:/lnk/fac/i586 > l libxfcegui4-* -rw-r--r-- 1 455 5200 251668 Sep 22 05:35 libxfcegui4-4.4.1-55.i586.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 455 5200 54708 Sep 22 05:35 libxfcegui4-devel-4.4.1-55.i586.rpm So, could not it just be named libxfcegui-devel? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
