On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:23:25PM +0100, Klaus Kaempf wrote: > I'd like to generate the following packages for Ruby 2.1 > > 1. ruby-2.1 > This would provide binaries (ruby, irb, rake, gem, ...) and a minimal > set of documentation (changelog, readme, news, ...) > > 2. libruby2 > This would only provide the libruby2.1.so.2.0.0 shared library > > 3. ruby-stdlib > This would provide the /usr/lib64/ruby/2.1.0/ directory tree.
Which use case needs 1+2+3 separated? > 4. ruby-doc > This would provide the full Ruby documentation including samples. > > 5. ruby-macros ? > This would be a new name for ruby-common, a package only used for > building ruby GEM packages. > Actually, I'm not happy about the name. It should reflect the package > usage. ruby-devel-build or ruby-build-macros could be alternatives. > > 6. ruby-devel, ruby-devel-extra, ruby-doc-ri > These would stay unchanged. -- Martin Vidner, Cloud & Systems Management Team http://en.opensuse.org/User:Mvidner Kuracke oddeleni v restauraci je jako fekalni oddeleni v bazenu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
