* Martin Vidner <[email protected]> [Jan 22. 2014 14:58]: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:23:25PM +0100, Klaus Kaempf wrote: > > I'd like to generate the following packages for Ruby 2.1 > > > > 1. ruby-2.1 > > This would provide binaries (ruby, irb, rake, gem, ...) and a minimal > > set of documentation (changelog, readme, news, ...) > > > > 2. libruby2 > > This would only provide the libruby2.1.so.2.0.0 shared library > > > > 3. ruby-stdlib > > This would provide the /usr/lib64/ruby/2.1.0/ directory tree. > > Which use case needs 1+2+3 separated?
Just for smaller maintenance updates. Plus a separate ruby-stdlib might help with a future ruby-stdlib-as-gems approach. Klaus -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
