On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 12:29 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Robert Schiele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:14:22AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> Robert Schiele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > No, you don't. You updated the db package (which is definitely part of > >> > the > >> > >> That's a bug ;-( > > > > This is what I am saying for years now but received only really stupid > > answers > > in response to that like: "We don't consider this a problem for us > > internally". > > > >> We rebuild that often that people often asked: What's the difference > >> between version -9 and -20? And we have to answer: Just rebuild with > >> newer packages. It would be great to only increase the number if a > > > > So what you are basically saying is that you fear that some people ask > > quetions and prefer incorrectness of the system over just answering these > > questions? Didn't expect you to be that reclusive. > > I was a bit short: The problem is especially with release products. > Your release today -9 and in a month -20 - with just one change. This > confused a lot of customers and partners, they asked for the other 10 > changes...
Not bumping the rev would be fine if no source and no deps changed, but the problem is that deps of the RPM will change right now and the rev will not be bumped, which seems incorrect. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
