On Friday 17 November 2006 19:43, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 11/17/06, JJ Gitties <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "*We* need to convince OpenSUSE to fork, or let 'em die. To bad, it is
> > > a wonderful Distro. But their parent company is NOT our friend."
>
> I'm sorry, but I think that is idiotic.
>
> I personally want linux to make headway into the corp world. That's
> what Novell is trying to do. This deal *may* have been a mistake, but
> to trumpet splitting now is tantamount to giving in.
>

Pruned
> Peter


The ONLY headway bieng made so far is microSlopS into making a fast buck out 
of Linux .

You talk of headway into the corperate sector   well   .. Fix the miriad of 
major show stoppers that were 10.1 and as far as i can see they are still 
there infesting 10.2  .

Suse will never get anywhere with the hacked together bits like the painfully 
loathesome  updater fiasco that was in 10.1   the self same infestation seems 
to have followed thru into 10.2  it MAY have a few more manners now but it is 
STILL  there clutsing up the system  , The original YOU update system may not 
have been the best thing sinced (British) sliced Bread  but it was far better 
than zmd and friends   .

OpenSuse should fork   and it should Retain the SuSe trademark  and the 
Original ideals   . Novell was a bad idea from day one 


Pete .

Suse 10.0  x86-64   with no unwanted infestations .

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to