* M Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-11-07 23:56]: > On Friday 11 May 2007 21:50, George Osvald wrote: > > My experience with Reiser is exact opposite. Exf3 has not caused any > > problems to me ever. Reiser corrupted the file system a couple of > > times beyond the point of recovery. Also the recovery in Exf3 is much > > faster. Exf3 simply replays the journal and that's it. Reiser was > > re-playing records one by one and that usually took much longer (both > > tested on AMD 64 with 1GB of memory) > Your reported experience is irrelevant to the discussion. > Reiserfs is technically what it is... no more... no less. It is a > superior filesystem to EXTx for several technical reasons which are > incompatible with your experience. I would have to question your > experience. This is a technical discussion, not a religious > testimony.
No, there are problems with reiserfs. I also lost data when a reiserfs system crashed and was unrecoverable. Since, I have moved to exf3 and have not lost data. I will stand the extra four or five minutes when I reboot every other month or so for the file system checks. Specs on paper and "superior" technology are not "always" the best route. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/ Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
