On Oct 10 2007 15:35, Sylvester Lykkehus wrote: > Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Oct 9 2007 20:45, Ben Kevan wrote: >> > What's the changes of us getting a suse built build service for the 2.6.23 >> > kernel to help utilize the new scheduler? >> >> chances -> not gonna happen too soon I presume (based on previous evidence). >> 10.3 got delivered with a fairly recent kernel (2.6.22), so it might come >> that 2.6.24 is the first to appear on the suse side. This is how it happened >> with 2.6.18(10.2)->2.6.20. > > A bit off-topic > Jan: > Are you planning on continuing building kernel RPMS with the ccj patchset for > _10.2_ in the future, or will you be focusing on 10.3 ?
Why, can't upgrade to 10.3? :p Since rebuilding is cheap, that is an option. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]