On Oct 10 2007 15:35, Sylvester Lykkehus wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Oct 9 2007 20:45, Ben Kevan wrote:
>> > What's the changes of us getting a suse built build service for the 2.6.23
>> > kernel to help utilize the new scheduler?
>> 
>> chances -> not gonna happen too soon I presume (based on previous evidence).
>> 10.3 got delivered with a fairly recent kernel (2.6.22), so it might come
>> that 2.6.24 is the first to appear on the suse side. This is how it happened
>> with 2.6.18(10.2)->2.6.20.
>
> A bit off-topic
> Jan:
> Are you planning on continuing building kernel RPMS with the ccj patchset for
> _10.2_ in the future, or will you be focusing on 10.3 ?

Why, can't upgrade to 10.3? :p
Since rebuilding is cheap, that is an option.
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to